Sora Watermark Remover - Allows you to remove the watermark from Sora videos.Try Now

CurateClick

Xiaomi MiMo-V2-Flash: Complete Guide to the 309B Parameter MoE Model (2025)

šŸŽÆ Core Highlights (TL;DR)

  • Efficient Architecture: 309B total parameters with only 15B active parameters using Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) design
  • Breakthrough Performance: Claims to match or exceed Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-5 on coding benchmarks like SWE-Bench Multilingual
  • Innovative Technology: Hybrid Sliding Window Attention reduces KV cache by 6x, Multi-Token Prediction triples inference speed
  • Open Source: Fully available on Hugging Face with weights and technical documentation
  • Mixed Reception: Community testing shows inconsistent results - some praise efficiency, others report instruction-following issues

Table of Contents

  1. What is MiMo-V2-Flash?
  2. Technical Architecture Deep Dive
  3. Performance Benchmarks Analysis
  4. How to Deploy and Run
  5. Community Feedback and Real-World Testing
  6. Comparison with Competitors
  7. Best Practices and Recommendations
  8. FAQ

What is MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is Xiaomi's latest open-source large language model, released in early 2025. It represents a significant entry into the competitive open LLM space, positioning itself as a high-performance yet efficient alternative to models like DeepSeek V3.2 and Claude Sonnet 4.5.

Key Specifications

SpecificationDetails
Total Parameters309B
Active Parameters15B (per forward pass)
Architecture TypeMixture-of-Experts (MoE)
Context WindowUp to 256K tokens
Training Data27T tokens with FP8 mixed precision
LicenseOpen source (available on Hugging Face)
VariantsBase model and Post-trained model

šŸ’” What Makes It "Flash"?
The "Flash" designation refers to inference speed, not model size. Despite 309B total parameters, the MoE architecture activates only 15B per request, enabling faster generation while maintaining quality.

Technical Architecture Deep Dive

Hybrid Sliding Window Attention (SWA)

MiMo-V2-Flash's most innovative feature is its attention mechanism:

Architecture Design:

  • 5:1 Ratio: 5 Sliding Window Attention (SWA) layers followed by 1 Global Attention (GA) layer
  • Aggressive Window Size: Only 128 tokens (compared to typical 2048-4096)
  • Attention Sink Bias: Learnable bias mechanism maintains long-context performance
  • KV Cache Reduction: Nearly 6x reduction in memory requirements

Multi-Token Prediction (MTP)

Unlike traditional speculative decoding, MiMo integrates MTP natively:

  • Lightweight Design: Only 0.33B parameters per block
  • Dense FFN Architecture: Uses dense feed-forward networks instead of MoE for prediction heads
  • 3x Speed Boost: Triples output generation speed during inference
  • RL Training Benefits: Accelerates rollout in reinforcement learning training

āš ļø Technical Note
The MTP module uses Sliding Window Attention instead of Global Attention to keep parameter count minimal, which is crucial for maintaining the "Flash" speed advantage.

Training Infrastructure

Pre-training Specifications:

  • 27 trillion tokens processed
  • FP8 mixed precision training
  • Native 32K sequence length
  • Extended to 256K context window support

Post-training Innovation:

  • Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation (MOPD): Dense token-level guidance from domain-specific expert models
  • Large-Scale Agentic RL: Over 100,000 verifiable GitHub issue tasks
  • Multimodal Verifier: Vision-based code verification using video recordings

Performance Benchmarks Analysis

Base Model Performance

The MiMo-V2-Flash-Base shows competitive results across standard benchmarks:

CategoryBenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashKimi-K2 BaseDeepSeek-V3.2
GeneralMMLU (5-shot)86.787.887.8
MMLU-Pro (5-shot)73.269.262.1
GPQA-Diamond55.148.152.0
MathGSM8K (8-shot)92.392.191.1
MATH (4-shot)71.070.262.5
AIME 24&2535.331.624.8
CodeHumanEval+70.784.867.7
BigCodeBench70.161.762.9
LiveCodeBench v630.826.324.9

Post-Training Model Performance

After MOPD and Agentic RL training, the model shows impressive gains:

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashClaude Sonnet 4.5GPT-5 HighDeepSeek-V3.2
AIME 202594.187.094.693.1
LiveCodeBench-v680.664.084.583.3
SWE-Bench Verified73.477.274.973.1
SWE-Bench Multilingual71.768.055.370.2
LongBench V260.661.8-58.4

āœ… Key Strengths

  • Exceptional performance on multilingual coding tasks
  • Strong mathematical reasoning (AIME 2025: 94.1%)
  • Competitive long-context handling up to 256K tokens
  • Superior efficiency: 15B active vs 37B+ in competitors

āš ļø Potential Concerns

  • Some benchmarks show suspiciously high scores for model size
  • Community testing reveals inconsistencies with official benchmarks
  • Possible benchmark contamination or overfitting concerns raised

How to Deploy and Run

System Requirements

Minimum Hardware for Q4 Quantization:

  • 2x RTX 5060 Ti (16GB each) = 32GB VRAM
  • 128GB System RAM
  • Expected speed: ~8 tokens/second

Recommended Hardware:

  • 8x H100 or A100 GPUs for full FP8 precision
  • High-bandwidth interconnect (NVLink/InfiniBand)

šŸ’” Quantization Recommendations

  • Q3/IQ3_XS: Fits on 32GB VRAM, minimal quality loss
  • Q4: Borderline for 32GB, may require optimization
  • FP8: Requires 160GB+ VRAM for full model

Installation with SGLang (Recommended)

# Install SGLang pip install sglang # Launch server with optimized settings python3 -m sglang.launch_server \ --model-path XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2-Flash \ --served-model-name mimo-v2-flash \ --pp-size 1 \ --dp-size 2 \ --enable-dp-attention \ --tp-size 8 \ --moe-a2a-backend deepep \ --page-size 1 \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 9001 \ --trust-remote-code \ --mem-fraction-static 0.75 \ --max-running-requests 128 \ --chunked-prefill-size 16384 \ --reasoning-parser qwen3 \ --tool-call-parser mimo \ --context-length 262144 \ --attention-backend fa3 \ --speculative-algorithm EAGLE \ --speculative-num-steps 3 \ --speculative-eagle-topk 1 \ --speculative-num-draft-tokens 4 \ --enable-mtp

API Usage Example

curl -i http://localhost:9001/v1/chat/completions \ -H 'Content-Type:application/json' \ -d '{ "messages": [{ "role": "system", "content": "You are MiMo, an AI assistant developed by Xiaomi. Today'\''s date: 2025-12-17. Your knowledge cutoff date is December 2024." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Write a Python function to calculate Fibonacci numbers" }], "model": "mimo-v2-flash", "max_tokens": 4096, "temperature": 0.8, "top_p": 0.95, "stream": true, "chat_template_kwargs": { "enable_thinking": true } }'

Critical Configuration Parameters

ParameterRecommended ValuePurpose
temperature0.8 (math/writing)
0.3 (coding/agents)
Controls randomness
top_p0.95Nucleus sampling threshold
enable_thinkingtrueActivates reasoning mode
context_length262144Maximum context window
enable-mtptrueEnables Multi-Token Prediction

āš ļø Important: System Prompt Required
The model performs significantly better with the official system prompt. Always include identity and date information for optimal results.

Alternative Deployment Options

OpenRouter Integration:

  • Free tier available directly from Xiaomi
  • No local hardware required
  • API-compatible with OpenAI format

llama.cpp Compatibility:

  • Not officially supported at launch
  • Community working on GGUF conversion
  • Rare architecture may cause compatibility issues

Community Feedback and Real-World Testing

Positive Experiences

From Reddit user feedback:

"From my testing it is as good as Sonnet 4.5 easily" - u/power97992 (Portuguese comment translated)

Efficiency Praise:

  • "Holy shit 309B total but only 15B active? That's actually insane efficiency if the benchmarks hold up" - u/Constant_Leader_6558
  • Successfully runs on consumer hardware with quantization
  • Fast inference speed maintained even with long contexts

Critical Observations

Instruction Following Issues:

"I really wished it was as good as they claimed it to be... it was all over the place, not able to follow instructions. Tool call was unreliable. Sometimes a simple 'hello how are you', gave me code in return." - u/ashim_k_saha

Benchmark Skepticism:

  • "The SWE-Bench performance is suspiciously good for a model of this size" - u/r4in311
  • "A pure 300B of junk. Bad instruction following, bad reasoning, the ultimate result of benchmaxxing" - u/Just_Lifeguard_5033

Comparative Performance:

  • Most users report it's comparable to MiniMax 2
  • Generally considered worse than DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
  • Mixed results on creative writing vs technical tasks

Aider Benchmark Results

Community-run Aider benchmark shows the model's practical coding performance in a standardized test environment, though specific scores were shared as an image in the Reddit thread.

šŸ’” Community Consensus
The model shows promise but exhibits inconsistency. Performance varies significantly based on task type, with stronger results in mathematical reasoning than general instruction following.

Comparison with Competitors

MiMo-V2-Flash vs DeepSeek V3.2

AspectMiMo-V2-FlashDeepSeek V3.2
Total Parameters309B671B
Active Parameters15B37B
Efficiencyāœ… Higher (5:1 ratio)Moderate
Code BenchmarksMixed (claims better)Proven strong
Community Trustāš ļø Skepticalāœ… Established
Instruction Followingāš ļø Reported issuesāœ… Reliable
Open Sourceāœ… Full weightsāœ… Full weights

MiMo-V2-Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.5

AspectMiMo-V2-FlashClaude Sonnet 4.5
Accessibilityāœ… Open sourceāŒ Closed API
CostFree (self-hosted)$3/$15 per MTok
SWE-Bench Multilingual71.7 (claimed)68.0
SWE-Bench Verified73.477.2
Real-world Codingāš ļø Inconsistent reportsāœ… Highly reliable
Context Window256K200K

MiMo-V2-Flash vs Kimi K2

AspectMiMo-V2-FlashKimi K2
Active Parameters15B32B
AIME 202594.194.5
Long ContextGood (256K)Excellent
Chinese Performance87.4 (CMMLU)90.9 (CMMLU)
Thinking ModeAvailableAdvanced

Best Practices and Recommendations

When to Use MiMo-V2-Flash

āœ… Recommended For:

  • Mathematical reasoning tasks (strong AIME/MATH performance)
  • Multilingual code generation
  • Long-context processing (up to 256K tokens)
  • Resource-constrained environments (15B active is efficient)
  • Experimentation with MoE architectures
  • Research on hybrid attention mechanisms

āŒ Not Recommended For:

  • Mission-critical production applications (inconsistent reliability)
  • Complex multi-turn conversations (instruction following issues)
  • Tool calling workflows (reported unreliability)
  • Tasks requiring consistent output formatting

Optimization Tips

1. Temperature Tuning:

{ "math_tasks": {"temperature": 0.8, "top_p": 0.95}, "coding_tasks": {"temperature": 0.3, "top_p": 0.95}, "creative_writing": {"temperature": 0.8, "top_p": 0.95} }

2. System Prompt Engineering:

  • Always include the official system prompt
  • Specify current date and knowledge cutoff
  • Use clear, structured instructions
  • Break complex tasks into steps

3. Context Management:

  • Leverage the 256K context window for long documents
  • Use chunked prefill (16384 tokens) for better performance
  • Monitor KV cache usage with the hybrid attention system

4. Multi-Turn Conversations:

  • Persist reasoning_content in message history
  • Be explicit about conversation context
  • Validate outputs before chaining requests

Hardware Optimization

For Consumer Hardware (32GB VRAM):

  • Use IQ3_XS or Q3 quantization
  • Enable MTP for faster generation
  • Limit concurrent requests to 2-4
  • Use CPU offloading for KV cache if needed

For Enterprise Deployment:

  • Deploy with 8x A100/H100 GPUs
  • Use FP8 precision for optimal quality
  • Enable data parallelism (dp-size 2+)
  • Implement request-level prefix caching

šŸ¤” Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Can I run MiMo-V2-Flash on consumer hardware?

A: Yes, with quantization. A setup with 2x RTX 5060 Ti (16GB each) and 128GB RAM can run Q3/Q4 quantized versions at approximately 8 tokens/second. However, llama.cpp support is not guaranteed due to the model's unique architecture.

Q: Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than DeepSeek V3.2?

A: Mixed results. Official benchmarks show competitive or superior performance, but community testing suggests DeepSeek V3.2 (especially the Speciale variant) is more reliable for general use. MiMo excels in specific areas like multilingual coding and mathematical reasoning but struggles with instruction following.

Q: Why are the benchmark scores controversial?

A: The community has raised concerns because:

  • Scores seem unusually high for a 15B active parameter model
  • Real-world testing doesn't consistently match benchmark claims
  • Some users report basic instruction-following failures
  • Potential benchmark contamination or overfitting suspected

Q: What does "Flash" mean in the model name?

A: "Flash" refers to inference speed, not model size. The MoE architecture activates only 15B of 309B total parameters per request, combined with Multi-Token Prediction that triples generation speed, making it faster than traditional dense models of similar quality.

Q: How does the Hybrid Sliding Window Attention work?

A: The model uses a 5:1 ratio of local (128-token window) to global attention layers. This reduces KV cache memory by ~6x while maintaining long-context performance through learnable attention sink bias. It's an aggressive optimization that trades some global context awareness for efficiency.

Q: Is there llama.cpp support?

A: Not officially at launch. The model uses a rare configuration (48 layers, short SWA window, MoE architecture) that may not be immediately compatible with llama.cpp. The community is working on GGUF conversion, but compatibility isn't guaranteed.

Q: What's the recommended temperature setting?

A:

  • 0.8 for math, writing, and web development
  • 0.3 for agentic tasks (coding, tool use)
  • Always use top_p=0.95

Q: Can I use it for free?

A: Yes, in two ways:

  1. Self-hosting: Download weights from Hugging Face and run locally
  2. OpenRouter: Free tier available, hosted by Xiaomi

Q: What's Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation (MOPD)?

A: MOPD is Xiaomi's training innovation where:

  • Multiple expert models provide token-level guidance
  • The student model learns from its own generations (on-policy)
  • Eliminates exposure bias from fixed datasets
  • Provides natural resistance to reward hacking

Q: How does it compare to GPT-4 or Claude for coding?

A: Official benchmarks claim competitive or superior performance on specific coding tasks (especially SWE-Bench Multilingual). However, community consensus suggests it's less reliable than Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-4 for production coding work, with better results on mathematical/algorithmic problems than general software engineering.

Conclusion and Recommendations

MiMo-V2-Flash represents an ambitious entry into the open-source LLM space, showcasing innovative architectural choices and impressive benchmark numbers. However, the gap between claimed performance and community testing results warrants careful evaluation.

Final Verdict

Strengths:

  • āœ… Exceptional efficiency (15B active parameters)
  • āœ… Strong mathematical reasoning capabilities
  • āœ… Innovative hybrid attention architecture
  • āœ… Fully open source with detailed documentation
  • āœ… Competitive performance on specific benchmarks

Weaknesses:

  • āš ļø Inconsistent instruction following
  • āš ļø Unreliable tool calling
  • āš ļø Benchmark claims don't fully match real-world testing
  • āš ļø Limited ecosystem support (no llama.cpp yet)

Who Should Use It?

Ideal Users:

  • Researchers exploring MoE architectures
  • Developers with specific math/coding tasks
  • Teams with resources to fine-tune and validate
  • Enthusiasts experimenting with efficient LLMs

Should Wait:

  • Production applications requiring reliability
  • Teams without validation resources
  • Users expecting Claude/GPT-4 level consistency

Next Steps

  1. Try the Free API: Test via OpenRouter before committing to self-hosting
  2. Run Specific Benchmarks: Validate performance on your actual use cases
  3. Monitor Community Updates: Architecture may improve with community contributions
  4. Compare Alternatives: Evaluate against DeepSeek V3.2, Qwen, and other open models
  5. Join the Community: Participate in Xiaomi's WeChat groups or GitHub discussions

Resources


Last Updated: December 2025 | Model Version: MiMo-V2-Flash | Status: Open Source

Xiaomi MiMo-V2-Flash Complete Guide

Tags:
MiMo-V2-Flash
Xiaomi AI
MoE Model
Large Language Model
Open Source LLM
AI Model Guide
Back to Blog
Last updated: December 17, 2025